Skip navigation
sponsored by 

Hatfill sues N.Y. Times over anthrax columns

‘Person of interest’ says newspaper ruined his reputation

Video: Security  
Col. Jack Jacobs asks: 'If not know, when?'
Oct. 10: Retired Col. Jack Jacobs talks about his new memoir, "If not know, when?" as well as the strain this financial crisis will have on the wars the U.S. is fighting in the Middle East.

  Economy in Turmoil
Gut Check America

Has your job been affected by the economic turmoil gripping the U.S.? Click here to share your story.

  Photo features  
  More
Curfew Imposed In Kashmir Ahead Of Independence Protest
Getty Images
  The Week in Pictures
From celebrations to curfew, people around the world share their moments.
Image: Resdients in a tent city for the homeless
Getty Images
PhotoBlog
View and discuss the pictures and issues that caught our eyes.
updated 3:28 p.m. ET July 14, 2004

WASHINGTON - A bioterrorism expert who was named by government authorities as a “person of interest” in the 2001 anthrax attacks has sued The New York Times, saying the newspaper ruined his reputation by pointing to him as the culprit.

Steven J. Hatfill filed the lawsuit Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va. He charged that a series of columns by Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Nicholas Kristof was irresponsible by failing to seek, or rejecting, statements of denials from Hatfill.

In several columns in 2002, Kristof faulted the FBI for not actively investigating a scientist he identified as “Mr. Z.” Descriptions of the “Mr. Z” were detailed enough that readers could recognize him as Hatfill and subsequent columns later identified him, the complaint states.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement

“It was inconsequential to defendant Kristof whether it turned out that his designated culprit was guilty or innocent, how reckless his allegations and insinuations were, or how injurious they were to his victim,” the lawsuit alleges. “What was at issue ... was to help ’light a fire’ under the federal investigators.”

The lawsuit said the newspaper declined to print a letter to the editor and an op-ed article from Hatfill’s lawyer, Victor Glasberg, that responded to the charges, according to the complaint.

A Times spokesman, Toby Usnik, said the lawsuit lacked merit. He noted that Hatfill had already been identified by government authorities as a “person of interest” by the time Kristof’s columns ran.

“While encouraging the FBI to investigate the matter, Mr. Kristof was careful to note that Dr. Hatfill was presumed to be innocent,” Usnik said. “We believe in a case like this, the law protects fair commentary on an important public issue.”

Hatfill also has a lawsuit pending against Attorney General John Ashcroft and other government authorities who named him as a “person of interest.” U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton in Washington is expected to rule soon on a government request to have that lawsuit dismissed.

© 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  MORE FROM SECURITY  
  
Security Section Front
 
Add Security headlines to your news reader:
 

Sponsored links

Resource guide

Get Your 2008 Credit Score

Find a business to start

Try for Free

Search Jobs

Find Your Dream Home

$7 trades, no fee IRAs

Find your next car