Reactions to Rice's nomination
She has the president's loyalty, but can she make over the State Department?
FREE VIDEO |
Rice's new role Nov. 16: With National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice tapped to succeed Colin Powell as Secretary of State, NBC's Andrea Mitchell examines Rice's relationship with President Bush and likely changes in U.S. diplomatic policy. Today show |
Most Popular |
| |||||
Exclusively on msnbc.com |
President Bush nominated national security adviser Condoleezza Rice to replace Colin Powell as secretary of state Tuesday.
Andrea Mitchell, David Gregory, and Pat Buchanan weighed in on MSNBC last night on what this means:
Andrea Mitchell:
![]() |
Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent Andrea Mitchell |
She has been unlike any previous foreign policy adviser. She goes to Texas with the Bushes. She goes to Camp David every weekend. She has really been his sidekick really on foreign policy.
The important thing is that this is much bigger than just Colin Powell leaving. This is, I am told, a complete top to bottom makeover of the State Department. And she has long wanted this to happen.
As long as she is representing the president, and is viewed as having his ear, she will not have a hard time. Madeleine Albright was secretary of state and I traveled with her to all of the Gulf states. And there was a lot of talk that she‘d have a hard time—she really didn’t. But the most significant thing about Condoleezza Rice is that she is really an extension of George Bush. So there won’t be any daylight there.
David Gregory:
![]() |
The expectation was that she wanted to go home, that she was just going to leave, and it was only in the last few months and that some, notably the president, prevailed upon her to take on a new and different challenge.
What is interesting about the secretary of state job is that there are many in this White House, the president included, who have not been big fans of the State Department and some of the diplomatic tracks that have been pursued and some of those diplomatic sensitivities, as we‘ve seen, in their conduct of foreign policy. Now she has to step into that culture, manage that culture, win friends there, but also, as you suggested earlier, be consistent and faithful to the president‘s goals of foreign policy here in the second term.
An immediate question is, did moderates lose within the administration? Did those moderate voices who have prevailed upon this president successfully, if you look at Colin Powell's history of secretary of state in this first term, and others within the State Department, did they lose?
Are there going to be wholesale changes that take a harder line when it comes to a second term foreign policy? Particularly, because people close to Don Rumsfeld say, while he's being deliberately coy about what he‘s going to do right now, that there is the expectation among his top advisers that he sticks around.
Pat Buchanan, MSNBC political analyst:
![]() |
Does she have the weight? I know she's got the president's absolute loyalty —but the weight, the experience that Colin Powell, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff had, to walk into that department and clean house?
Dr. Rice is a scholar and Dr. Rice is a staffer. She is going to be sitting on top of a rebellious institution which adores Colin Powell and which is not going to go quietly if there`s going to be blood all over the floor there.
We've got a battle royal coming here inside the government. We already see it broken out over at the Central Intelligence Agency. The president has got every right to do it, but what he is doing is is he's making sure all his loyalists are in the positions that he wants them in, people from the White House, which means he alone is going to be held fully accountable and fully responsible.
Condoleezza Rice is an extremely bright young woman. She served ably on the National Security Council staff, but she is fundamentally a staff officer. And someone in this government— and the president should find out who— clearly did not prepare this country for the aftermath of Tommy Franks' three-weeks war. That's why we're in a hellish mess today in Iraq.
I think part of that responsibility clearly lies with the individual who should have been asking the questions. And she's going to be asked those questions up there at the Foreign Relations Committee.
Finally, Condi Rice is not a conservative— she's a neoconservative. And the neoconservatives have won virtually every battle now. They have all the seats of power. And they are not loved in this D.C., not simply by the bureaucracy, but by some traditionalist old Right folks, by a lot of journalists and others. And what the president has got — he's basically declared war on this city with a very narrow set of alliances.
| Rate this story | Low | High |
MORE FROM HARDBALL WITH CHRIS MATTHEWS |
| Add Hardball with Chris Matthews headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide








