Skip navigation
sponsored by 

EPA cuts deal with factory farms on waste

Sierra Club feels it lets industry off the hook

  Photo features  
  More
A stall holder selling pig masks stands at his stall at the annual Glastonbuury Festival 2008 in Somerset in southwest England
Reuters
  The Week in Pictures
Everyday people living everyday lives despite heat and storms
New York Yankees left fielder Damon falls to field at Yankee Stadium in New York
Reuters
PhotoBlog
View and discuss the pictures and issues that caught our eyes.
MSNBC staff and news service reports
updated 3:41 p.m. ET Jan. 21, 2005

WASHINGTON - Factory-style farms that generate a huge amount of animal waste will be exempt from Clean Air Act fines of more than $100,000 if they agree to monitor their air quality and submit the data to the government for use in future regulation, the Environmental Protection Agency said Friday.

The EPA said its offer could result in the first federal emissions standards for animal processing farms within about four years. By contrast, setting the air quality standards by forcing the farms to submit to air quality monitoring could take a decade or more, EPA officials said.

Environmentalists were critical of the plan. "The largest corporations in the livestock industry are being let off-the-hook in exchange for agreeing to ‘study’ their air pollution and paying small fees," the Sierra Club's Ed Hopkins said in a statement. "Under this deal, the companies are not actually required to reduce any harmful pollution."

Story continues below ↓
advertisement

In exchange for agreeing to submit to monitoring, the farms would be immune to federal Clean Air Act violations until the regulation is made final. The companies that operate them also would contribute $2,500 to an EPA air monitoring fund and pay a one-time civil penalty of anywhere from $200 to $100,000, based on the size and number of their farms, to forgive presumed past air quality violations.

“This is not a ’pay up and get out of jail free’ pass,” said Thomas Skinner, EPA’s acting chief of enforcement. Rather, he said, it was intended to give EPA the ability to ensure that as many of the farms as possible are complying with clean air laws in the shortest time possible.

The deal will not undercut state and local laws the farms are subject to, Skinner said.

Hopkins claimed that "under the Clean Air Act, the EPA already has the ability to require polluting facilities to provide data on their emissions, without exempting the polluters and putting nearby residents at risk."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Sponsored links

Resource guide

Search Jobs

View Photos of Singles

Find your next car

Find Your Dream Home

Find a business to start

$7 trades, no fee IRAs